Building Belonging: MNA Training Feedback and Participant Demographic Data

March 26, 2025 • By: MNA, Montana Nonprofit Association

In 2024, MNA began gathering demographic participant information for our feedback surveys. This effort is part of our Building Belonging workplan, and is an attempt to gather data on how our trainings resonate with diverse audiences. In lieu of collecting demographic data on event registrations, which we felt would be burdensome to the registration process, we opted to add an optional demographic question on our universal training feedback survey. This process also allows us to better anonymize demographic data. You can read more about our data collection practices here. 

This data is just a starting point to understand where and with whom our training experiences are resonating. In the future, we’ll build on the information we’ve collected to improve and target our work. A snapshot of the data can be viewed below.  

Please note this data was gathered through opt-in methods and does not represent a statistically significant sample. We are sure there are additional ways to understand these numbers and the feedback we’ve received. Below are the lessons we are already working on implementing. 

Takeaways: 

1. We are grateful that over half of feedback survey participants chose to provide us with demographic information. We look forward to continuing to be able to collect and analyze how our programming meets everyone’s needs. 

2. Respondents who identify as Black, Indigenous, People of Color (BIPOC) are less satisfied with peer connection offered in courses (56%) compared to (62%) of all respondents. This supports theories around belonging within adult learning spaces geared towards dominant culture and can exacerbate feelings of isolation.

3. Training topics in 2024 around equity were often geared toward an entry level white audience, leaving BIPOC participants or those with prior experience or expertise less satisfied with the training. 

4. BIPOC respondents value MNA training as less impactful and meaningful professionally and organizationally, as observed in impact question and disparity in satisfaction of resources provided. This naturally follows from observations above and highlights the work MNA needs to do to better understand and serve the needs of BIPOC led and serving organizations. 

5. Organizations led by and serving rural areas have higher than average satisfaction with MNA events, likely reflecting concerted efforts in the past three years to develop and deliver rural specific content and training. We hope to take this lesson and build more tailored information and accessible experiences for BIPOC audiences.  

MNA will take this information seriously as we plan for future trainings and events. Our next immediate steps are: 

1. Invest in offering more affinity spaces within trainings when appropriate or as additional offerings to enhance opportunities for peer connection. 

2. Identify specific training opportunities that resonate for minoritized nonprofit leaders and staff through continued engagement, feedback, and conversation. Part of our success in rural programming is likely tied to the careful creation and in-person nature of programming to meet participants’ needs. Identifying how to replicate this success with other populations will require ongoing communication and intention.  

3. Review our strategy for rural engagement and consider how we might replicate success for BIPOC and other underserved communities. 

4. Set a goal for improvement in our 2025 demographic data and training feedback. 

Total responses: 

General Feedback: 56% of respondents chose to provide demographic data 
Impact Survey: 88% chose to provide demographic data 

Training Feedback

Training Feedback Survey Responses
All  BIPOC Respondents  Orgs Serving LGBTQIA2S+, People with Disabilities, and/or BIPOC communities  Orgs Serving Rural Only 
Total Respondents 268  23  31  60 
Net Promoter Score 63  61  65  67 
Percentage of respondents who reported satisfaction with the following:
Met Advertised Description  95%  95%  91%  97% 
Satisfaction with Content  95%  95%  93%  96% 
Satisfaction with Resources  92%  86%  87%  90% 
Satisfaction with Practice Time  70%  69%  68%  75% 
Satisfaction with Peer Connection  62%  56%  61%  63% 
Satisfaction with Course Comms  91%  100%  96%  97% 

Impact Report

Impact Survey
All  BIPOC Respondents  Orgs Serving LGBTQIA2S+, People with Disabilities, and/or BIPOC communities  Orgs Serving Rural Only 
Total Respondents 125  15  19  42 
Respondents who identified a takeaway  74% Yes  67% Yes  58% Yes  86% Yes 
Level of change that occurred as a result of the class 15% minimal 8% minimal 34% minimal 12.5% minimal
76% some 92% some 76% some 75% some
9% high 0% high 0% high 12.5% high
Barriers to implementing change Time (43%) and Resources or funding (32%)  Split between all more evenly, time at 27%, with others split at 20%  Time (37%) and Resources or funding (37%)  Time (45%), Resources or funding (43%) 
Perception that participation in MNA offerings supported you professionally 73% at 5-6  60% at 5-6  79% at 5-6  78% at 5-6 
Perception that participation in MNA's offerings supported your organization's effectiveness 64% at 5-6  60% at 5-6  68% at 5-6  76% at 5-6 

Do you notice something different in the data above? 

If you have questions or feedback on our reporting of data, please reach out to srogala@mtnonprofit.org. Interested in helping steer our ship? Learn how you can serve on MNA’s Training and Education Advisory Committee (TEACh).  

In 2025, MNA has launched our BIPOC Affinity Group. Learn more and register here.  

Upcoming trainings also include our Creating Culturally Safe Spaces for Indigenous Populations, with a special affinity offering for BIPOC individuals. 

Search by tag: